If a seller agrees to sell a property for less than the listing price after the listing has expired, what may happen if the broker can prove collusion?

In this scenario, if a seller agrees to sell a property for less than the listing price after the listing has expired and the broker can prove collusion, it suggests that there was a deliberate intent to bypass the contractual agreement originally made with the broker. Collusion typically implies cooperation between parties to deceive or gain an unfair advantage.

If the broker can provide evidence of collusion, this can undermine the seller's stance and solidify the broker's claim to the commission. The presence of collusion indicates that the seller and possibly the buyer conspired to avoid paying the agreed-upon commission to the broker. Therefore, the broker may be entitled to receive the full commission from the seller despite the contract's expiration. This outcome maintains the integrity of the brokerage agreement and discourages unethical behavior in real estate transactions.

Understanding the implications of collusion highlights the importance of upholding contractual obligations and the protections afforded to brokers in scenarios where unethical practices are at play.